Through Terminating a Cruel Conservative Welfare Policy, This Budget Definitively Outlines How Labour Will Fight the Battle to Revitalize Britain
Yesterday, the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, presented a Labour economic plan. People have been asking for Labour’s mission and values to be more clearly articulated. By way of the choices made – a transition to a fairer tax system, targeting wealth to fund addressing child poverty, quality public services and the living expenses – we have clearly demonstrated what we stand for.
This is why Labour MPs cheered in the Commons, and it’s why we are ready for the fights to come. And it’s why the protests from the conservative side began immediately.
The Central Political Divide in British Politics
The central division in British politics is yet again on the economy. On the one hand Labour, who want to reform it so it helps ordinary working people, and on the other, our political opponents, who favor the current system and the failed ideology of the past. We must now confront, and win, the debate.
The Tories had 14 years to resolve things and in reality, by any measure, they got far more dire. Their doctrinaire austerity and supply-side economics – tax breaks for the wealthy, cutting off investment (causing us with poor productivity and wages), and failing to support young people post-Covid – didn’t work.
Legacy of Failure Under the Previous Government
Quality of life fell by the biggest amount since records began, child poverty reached record levels, NHS waiting lists in England were the highest on record, wages were stagnant, a housing crisis became entrenched, young people affected by Covid were abandoned. The record of failure continues.
One budget alone can’t fix everything, so Labour has a comprehensive plan for rebuilding and for rewiring the country. And we have to go out and continue making the case for why our approach will reap dividends.
Welfare Spending and Youth Deprivation
During the Tories, welfare spending significantly increased. As did child poverty, because they failed to tackle the underlying issues: low pay, high housing costs, deep inequalities in education, health and regions. The state ends up paying more to manage the effects instead of the cure.
That’s why we are constructing more affordable homes than for a generation, increasing wages and new rights for workers, greatly increasing investment in infrastructure and new industries, getting waiting lists down and lowering the costs of childcare and energy as we pursue clean power.
Ending the Two-Child Benefit Cap
This is also the reason we are absolutely right to use this budget to remove the two-child benefit cap.
For almost a decade, since it was introduced, poorer families with children have suffered from a cruel social experiment that was branded as fair for working people when it was the opposite. Most of the families affected by it have a parent in work.
It has only served to push 300,000 more children into poverty – which, ultimately, costs us more, as well as being heartless and immoral.
Tangible Effects in Communities
I know from my own district – where over 5,000 children will be raised out of poverty as a result of abolishing the cap – the actual impact it’s had. Children wearing low-cost wellies as school shoes, children going to bed without food and cold, living in overcrowded, mouldy homes, parents this Christmas depending on food banks for a modest meal or small gift for their kids.
I also see the impact on schools, teachers, social workers, doctors and charities who are already stretched but have to divert time and resources to supporting children who are living with the consequences of severe deprivation.
Lasting Consequences of Youth Hardship
Just one in four pupils from the most disadvantaged families achieve five good GCSEs, compared with almost 75% among affluent families. This sets them up for the disadvantages they face throughout their lives: unrealized potential, economic struggles and ill health. Children who grew up in poverty are more likely to be jobless or poor as adults.
Confronting child poverty isn’t just a moral imperative, it is a long-term investment. Poverty costs the economy significantly more than the £3bn cost of removing the two-child cap, or extending free school meals.
That’s why we acted promptly in the budget, despite the very difficult economic context. Every day with this cap in place sees over a hundred extra children pushed into poverty. The effects of lifting it won’t happen overnight either, so taking early action in the parliament was crucial.
The cap was a symbol to 14 years of unsuccessful conservative ideology. Now it is gone.
Fair Funding for Policies
We, as Labour, can also be clear that these measures are being paid for in a just way – from a new gaming tax, eliminating tax loopholes and a new “mansion tax”.
Conclusion
Equity and direction – that’s how we will succeed in the contest of ideas. This budget is a clear statement that we won the election as Labour, and will govern as Labour. As I consistently said during my campaign to become deputy leader, we must reclaim the political platform and set the agenda more strongly about what’s really wrong with the country and how we are fixing it. We’ve certainly done that this week.
So let’s keep hold of it and prevail in this struggle about how we will rebuild Britain and tackle the deep inequalities impeding progress.