🔗 Share this article

The number of reserved positions for Māori representatives on New Zealand local authorities will be slashed by more than half, after a controversial legislative amendment that required municipal councils to submit the fate of hard-won Indigenous wards to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which can include one or more elected officials based on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to give Māori electors the option to vote for a assured Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Initially, local governments could only establish a Indigenous seat by first putting it to a public vote in their region. Communities frequently devoted considerable time generating community backing and urging their councils to establish Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To address this concern, the former administration allowed municipal authorities to establish a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to put it to a public vote.

However, this year, the current administration overturned the policy, saying communities should decide whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change mandated local authorities that had created a electoral district under Labour’s rules to conduct decisive public votes alongside the local body elections, which concluded on October 11. Out of 42 local governments participating in the referendum, 17 voted to keep their seats, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – revealing many regions opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes provided “a vital step in restoring local democratic control.”

Opposition parties however have condemned the government’s law change as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the current administration has implemented extensive reversals to measures designed to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has said it aims to end “ethnic-specific” policies, and says it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the public votes were split down city-country divisions – six of the seven urban centers mandated to hold referendums supported Indigenous seats, while rural regions skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

This year’s local government elections recorded the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with under one-third of eligible voters casting a vote, prompting calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are able to create different electoral districts – such as countryside seats – without first requiring a public vote. The different conditions placed on Indigenous representation indicated the administration was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark concerned the 17 areas that voted to retain their seats.