🔗 Share this article

The debated, American and Israeli-supported Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) declares it is winding down its relief activities in the affected area, after almost six months.

The group had previously halted its three food distribution sites in Gaza following the truce agreement between Hamas and Israel came into force in recent weeks.

The GHF aimed to bypass the UN as the primary provider of humanitarian assistance to Gazans.

UN and other aid agencies would not collaborate with its system, claiming it was unethical and unsafe.

Numerous Gazans were lost their lives while attempting to obtain sustenance amid disorderly situations near GHF's sites, mostly by Israeli fire, according to the UN.

The Israeli military claimed its troops fired alerting fire.

Operation Conclusion

The GHF said on the beginning of the week that it was terminating work now because of the "successful completion of its emergency mission", with a total of three million packages containing the amounting to in excess of 187 million sustenance units provided to residents.

The foundation's chief officer, the executive director, also said the American-directed Civil-Military Coordination Center - which has been set up to help execute US President Donald Trump's Gaza peace plan - would be "adopting and expanding the approach the organization demonstrated".

"GHF's model, in which militant groups were prevented from misappropriating relief supplies, had major impact in getting Hamas to the table and achieving a ceasefire."

Feedback and Statements

Hamas - which denies stealing aid - supported the shutdown of the GHF, as indicated by media.

A representative of declared the foundation should be subject to scrutiny for the harm it caused to Gazans.

"We urge all international human rights organisations to make certain that consequences are faced after leading to casualties and wounds of many residents and covering up the nutritional restriction approach employed by the Israeli government."

Organization Timeline

The GHF began operations in Gaza on 26 May, a seven days following the Israeli government had moderately reduced a comprehensive closure on aid and commercial deliveries to Gaza that persisted for nearly three months and caused severe shortages of vital resources.

Subsequently, a food crisis was announced in the Gaza metropolitan area.

The GHF's food distribution sites in various parts of the Palestinian territory were managed by American private security firms and situated within areas controlled by Israeli forces.

Aid Organization Objections

International organizations and their affiliates claimed the methodology violated the basic relief guidelines of objectivity, fairness and autonomy, and that channelling desperate people into armed forces regions was inherently unsafe.

International human rights monitoring body stated it documented the killing of at least 859 Palestinians attempting to obtain nourishment in the vicinity of GHF sites between 26 May and 31 July.

An additional 514 individuals were killed near the routes of UN and other aid convoys, it added.

The majority of these individuals were killed by the Israeli military, according to the office.

Divergent Narratives

Israel's armed services claimed its forces had released alerting fire at people who approached them in a "threatening" way.

The organization declared there were no firearm incidents at the relief locations and alleged that United Nations of using "untrue and confusing" statistics from the Gazan medical department controlled by militant factions.

Subsequent Developments

The GHF's future had been unclear since militant groups and the Israeli government approved a halt in hostilities arrangement to carry out the initial stage of Trump's peace plan.

The agreement stated aid distribution would take place "absent meddling from the both sides through the international bodies and their affiliates, and the Red Crescent, in combination with other global organizations not connected in any way" with Palestinian factions and Israeli authorities.

UN spokesperson the UN spokesman said on Monday that the foundation's closure would have "no impact" on its operations "because we never worked with them".

The spokesperson additionally stated that while increased relief was entering the region since the ceasefire took effect on October 10th, it was "insufficient to satisfy all requirements" of the 2.1 million residents.